MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2053912672 · doi:10.1080/16864360.2014.914384

In-Situ Measurement and Distributed Computing for Adjustable CNC Machining

2014· article· en· W2053912672 on OpenAlexaff
Allan D. Spence, D. Alan Sawula, James R. Stone, Yu Pin Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer-Aided Design and Applications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiningNumerical controlIn situComputer scienceMechanical engineeringManufacturing engineeringEngineering drawingEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional methods for developing foot orthoses require extensive skilled manual labor.More modern methods have sought to address this with the introduction of computer enabled technologies such as digital scanning, computer aided design, and automated manufacturing.The current work further advances the process with the introduction of an additional computer enabled technology, simulation models, into two additional steps.First, a simulation model is used to achieve the postural adjustments to the foot normally done by a practitioner.This has the benefit of further automating the process, improving repeatability, and preventing the deformation of the plantar soft tissues that normally occurs with physical postural adjustment.Second, the simulation model is used in a routine to optimize plantar pressure distribution.When compared to a conventional method, the proposed approach yielded a 61% reduction in peak plantar pressure.Future work includes automating the optimization routines for a variety of metrics.Other applications for the current work include the development processes of orthoses and prostheses for other parts of the body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer-Aided Design and Applications→Same topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques→French-language works237,207→