MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053921011 · doi:10.1002/mop.26965

Wideband circularly polarized single probe‐fed patch antenna

2012· article· en· W2053921011 on OpenAlexaff
Jinping Ma, Ammar B. Kouki, René Landry

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandGround planeCircular polarizationOpticsPatch antennaMicrowaveBandwidth (computing)Microstrip antennaAxial ratioMaterials sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsAntenna (radio)EngineeringTelecommunicationsMicrostrip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A wideband circularly polarized single‐patch single probe‐fed patch antenna is investigated for applications of GPS L5, L2 and Galileo E5a, E5b bands. The wideband circular polarization (CP) is achieved by corner‐truncated square patch and insertion of a thick air layer between the radiating patch and the ground plane. A conducting circular disc is etched on the back side of the substrate to compensate the long inductive probe. The obtained 3‐dB axial ratio (AR) CP bandwidth for 25 and 28.5 mm air layer are 5.9% (71 MHz) and 6.4% (77 MHz), respectively. The later covers the all lower L bands of GPS and Galileo. The realized antenna gain reaches 6.45 dBi over the 3‐dB AR bandwidth. The measured and simulated results are in excellent agreement. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 54:1803–1808, 2012; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.26965

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207