MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053925325 · doi:10.1353/itc.2007.0024

Dante, Cinema and Television (review)

2007· article· en· W2053925325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Franco Masciandaro

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Culture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterVirtueHollywoodArtPoetryThe artsLiteratureArt historyVisual artsPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Dante, Cinema and Television Franco Masciandaro Amilcare A. Iannucci , ed. Dante, Cinema and Television. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004. Pp. xviii + 245. In his encounter with his ancestor Cacciaguida, Dante imagines that for many the retelling of what he has learned in his journey must have "sapor di forte agrume," and adds: "e s'io al vero son timido amico, / temo di perder viver tra coloro / che questo tempo chiameranno antico" (Par. 17.117–20). As we ponder these words, considering the many ways in which the modern world continues to recognize Dante's authenticity as poet, indeed as a living presence among us who call his time "antico," especially for his deep concern with telling the truth as he experienced it, and therefore with the ethics of poetry, we must also consider that this living presence has been and may continue to be realized only in virtue of the authenticity of his readers' response. Amilcare Iannucci's anthology of essays by various authors, Dante, Cinema and Television, which includes his own "Dante and Hollywood," is a significant, timely measure of this response as it shows how Dante's profound influence on the literary world, and on the visual arts and music, has also "spread decisively into the non-literary or para-literary world of the visual media unique to the twentieth century, namely cinema and television" (ix). Such response can best be described as a dialogue. "Just as Dante," notes Iannucci, "created his world out of dialogue with all of the voices which preceded him, so Dante continues to engage in dialogue with the whole of human culture, seen as a complex aggregate of alterity and outsidedness. As such, Dante's work possesses incredible potential to generate new meanings" (4). In his overview of Dante's influence on Hollywood, Iannucci sheds light on vital aspects of this dialogue and, correspondingly, the "new meanings" it generates, as he traces the influence of the Divine Comedy on film, beginning with silent films—the first, and earliest, is Francesca da Rimini (1907), produced by the New York Vitagraph Company (and hence a product of what Iannucci calls "Hollywood East")—down to the sound period, from Harry Lachman's Dante's Inferno (1935) to Taylor Hackford's The Devil's Advocate (1997) and Woody Allen's Deconstructing Harry (1998). Iannucci's discussion is especially insightful in showing how directors who "enter Dante's world to retrieve a single detail, scene or idea, often become ensnared in a web of interrelated references," and "as a result, they wind up appropriating from Dante much more than they had probably originally intended" (18). [End Page 203] The other essays in Iannucci's collection represent a variety of approaches. Applying a philological/historical method, in "Early Cinema, Dante's Inferno of 1911, and the Origins of Italian Film Culture," John P. Welle argues that Milano's film Dante's Inferno "is perhaps best understood as a bridge between the early cinema of attractions and a cinema in transition toward classical film narration," and that "the film's participation in a broader set of dynamics involving the interaction of film and literature [. . .] has helped to establish the parameters of Italian film culture" (23). Particularly notable are Welle's observations about the importance of Dante's Inferno, not only for its stylistic and technical characteristics (which appear to be shaped within "an iconographical framework made popular by Gustave Doré" [40]), but also for its contribution to the development of Italian national culture and civil consciousness. Welle buttresses this assessment by citing, among others, these remarks from Angelo Aliverti's review of the film Dante's Inferno (quoted in Lux, 2 April 1911): "È appunto in questa diffusione insperata delle opere artistiche e letterarie, in questo ravvicinamento dei capolavori della stirpe con l'anima popolare, che bisogna riconoscere e presentire un fattore potente della cultura e della civiltà di domani" (40). In reading these observations, one cannot help but note—and this is one small flaw in an otherwise very sound essay—that Welle might have been reasonably expected to offer some comment, however brief, on the inflated rhetoric of the phrase in question ("i capolavori della stirpe...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian CultureSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207