Expression, Distribution and Regulation of Sex Steroid Hormone Receptors in Mouse Heart
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of sex hormones on the heart are dependent on the presence and distribution of sex steroid hormone receptors (SSHR) in cardiac tissue. This study used subcellular fractionation, Western blot analysis and densitometry to characterize the subcellular distribution and abundance of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, ERbeta and androgen receptor (AR) in atrial and ventricular tissue from male and female mice. The results showed that in both atrial and ventricular tissue ERalpha was primarily found in the sarcolemma, whereas ERbeta and AR were predominantly located in the nucleus and cytosol. Interestingly, ERalpha expression was greater in the ventricles compared to the atria, whereas ERbeta and AR expression were similar in both heart chambers. Furthermore, the distribution and abundance of SSHR in the atria and ventricles did not differ between sexes. This study also showed that a reduction in hormone levels (as a result of ovariectomy) resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of ERalpha in the ventricular sarcolemmal fraction. Overall, the results suggest ERalpha, ERbeta and AR distribution and expression are not sex dependent in the mouse heart. However, it appears that ERalpha expression is chamber specific and that, in certain cases, hormone levels can modulate the subcellular location of SSHRs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it