Sparse linear arrays for estimating and tracking DOAs of signals with known waveforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are two main ways by which antenna arrays can significantly improve the performance of the direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation. In the first method, one can extend the array aperture by designing a sparse antennas array. The second method makes use of the temporal information of the received signals, such as the signal waveform. A few articles have dealt with DOA estimation by combining the above two approaches. In this paper, we present a DOA estimation and tracking method by employing the known waveform of the signal and the parallel recursive least square (RLS) technique. When the waveform of the signal is known, the output of each sensor in the array can be considered as a linear regression model of which the coefficients contain the whole information for estimating the DOA. Therefore, the RLS filter is used to estimate and track these coefficients and then the relationship among the coefficients of all the sensors is exploited to obtain the final DOA value without ambiguity. Finally, computer simulation of the proposed method with comparison to the previous methods is conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".