MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

International Consensus Conference on Atopic Dermatitis II (ICCAD II*): clinical update and current treatment strategies

2003· review· en· W2053952900 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Charles N. Ellis, Thomas A. Luger, Dietrich Abeck, Roger J. Allen, R.A.C. GRAHAM-BROWN, Y. De Prost, Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Carlos Ferrándiz, Alberto Giannetti, Jon M. Hanifin, John Koo, Denise Leung, Charles Lynde, Johannes Ring, Ramón Ruiz‐Maldonado, J-H. Saurat

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoTechnische Universität MünchenUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversité de GenèveSchool of Medicine, University of California, San DiegoInstituto Nacional de Pediatria
KeywordsAtopic dermatitisMedicineDermatologyLibrary scienceFamily medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

* The first ICCAD meeting was held in Rome in 1999, the proceedings of which were published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2001;45: S1−67). Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease, characterized by intense itching, dry skin, inflammation and exudation. It causes physical and emotional distress for patients and their families. The first symptoms commonly develop in infancy, with around 50% of cases diagnosed by 1 year of age,1 and AD is typically a long‐term condition with at least one‐third of patients having persistent disease throughout adulthood. However the vast majority of cases of atopic dermatitis are mild in severity and usually can be managed easily.2 The disease is often familial and frequently associated with asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis and recurrent secondary skin infections. Atopic dermatitis has significant impact on quality of life in both children3 and adults.4 The impact is greater than with psoriasis and is equivalent to other serious medical conditions such as early onset of diabetes mellitus.5 The prevalence of atopic dermatitis has increased steadily in recent decades.4 In developed countries approximately 10–15% of children under 5 years of age are affected at some stage.4 The likelihood is that 60% of children with atopic dermatitis may recover free of the disease, the remainder having recurrences for long periods of time.6 It has also been suggested that the best prognosis for the disease is in those children who developed AD in the first year of life.7 However, overall the earlier the onset and the more severe the disease, there is a greater chance of persistence, especially with concurrent atopic disorders. Recent evidence has indicated a common pathophysiological link between severe atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis8, 9 (for example both asthma and AD are associated with increased IgE and eosinophilia). It has been suggested that atopic dermatitis may increase the subsequent risk or severity of asthma.10

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations217
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207