MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053962035 · doi:10.2478/s11532-013-0282-8

The Ti-Fe-P system: phase equilibria and crystal structure of phases

2013· article· en· W2053962035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsCrystallographyStoichiometryTernary operationDiffractionPhase (matter)Powder diffractionCrystal structureMaterials sciencePhase diagramSpace groupCrystal (programming language)Ternary numeral systemSolid solutionType (biology)Group (periodic table)ChemistryX-ray crystallographyPhysical chemistryMetallurgyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract Phase equilibria was investigated in the Ti-Fe-P system at T = 1070 K in the region 0–67 at.% of P, employing X-ray powder diffraction. The two ternary compounds, namely Ti0.5–0.8Fe1.5−1.2P (Co2Si-type; space group Pnma; a = 0.5964(2)–0.6011(3), b = 0.3575(3)–0.3600(1), c = 0.6828(2)–0.6882(2) nm) and Ti0.85−1.25Fe1.15−0.75P (ZrNiAl-type; space group P-62m; a = 0.6071(4)–0.6117(1), c = 0.3510(9)–0.3506(1) nm) exist in the Ti-Fe-P system at this temperature. The crystal structure of the Ti0.85–1.25Fe1.15−0.75P compound was additionally determined by X-ray single crystal diffraction on the phase with stoichiometric composition. The substitutions of Ti by Fe were observed for Ti5P3.16, Ti3P and TiP phases, and Fe for Ti in the case of Fe3P, Fe2P binary compounds. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it