Dimensional stability of single‐site ethylene copolymers in rotational molding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The dimensional stability of ethylene copolymers in rotational molding was studied by comparing the warpage observed for a series of conventional and single‐site catalyzed ethylene copolymers. Bench‐scale molding trials were carried out under controlled molding conditions. The rapid cooling of the mold using a water spray resulted in greater warpage. Under such conditions, molded parts made using the single‐site resins showed less warpage compared to the Ziegler‐catalyzed copolymers with otherwise comparable densities. The Ziegler‐catalyzed copolymers were characterized by a faster crystallization rate, and were shown to generate larger crystallinity gradients through the part thickness during the cooling process. Second to temperature gradients, crystallinity gradients are a leading cause for the development of residual stresses and causing warpage. Differences in the crystallization rates between single‐site and Ziegler‐catalyzed copolymers are discussed based on their intermolecular comonomer distributions. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".