The relation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity and heart rate fluctuations at rest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies applying functional magnetic resonance imaging have focused on the description of cerebral substrates of changes in cardiac function during diverse autonomic maneuvers or stressful cognitive tasks. These studies might be limited by the indistinguishable neuronal activity due to cognitive processes, which are known to influence autonomic function, and the 'baseline' activity in the central autonomic network. We therefore investigated 26 healthy volunteers in the magnetic resonance scanner to simultaneously obtain functional brain images and RR intervals (intervals between ventricular depolarizations) of the high-resolution electrocardiogram. The mean RR interval length within each functional scan was computed, which was finally convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function to obtain a regressor for the functional time series. The resulting individual contrast image indicated a positive covariation of the blood oxygen level-dependent signal and RR interval length in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Furthermore, a reduced mean cross-approximate entropy value was shown for the interaction between the vmPFC and individual RR intervals. This suggests reduced asynchrony between the heart rate and vmPFC activity in contrast to other brain areas. Our findings confirm data obtained in animals describing the vmPFC as an important forebrain structure of the central autonomic network and an influence of the vmPFC in the cortical generation of efferent vagal activity. This finding needs to be investigated in diseases with known suppression of efferent vagal modulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | high |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".