The relation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity and heart rate fluctuations at rest
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies applying functional magnetic resonance imaging have focused on the description of cerebral substrates of changes in cardiac function during diverse autonomic maneuvers or stressful cognitive tasks. These studies might be limited by the indistinguishable neuronal activity due to cognitive processes, which are known to influence autonomic function, and the 'baseline' activity in the central autonomic network. We therefore investigated 26 healthy volunteers in the magnetic resonance scanner to simultaneously obtain functional brain images and RR intervals (intervals between ventricular depolarizations) of the high-resolution electrocardiogram. The mean RR interval length within each functional scan was computed, which was finally convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function to obtain a regressor for the functional time series. The resulting individual contrast image indicated a positive covariation of the blood oxygen level-dependent signal and RR interval length in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Furthermore, a reduced mean cross-approximate entropy value was shown for the interaction between the vmPFC and individual RR intervals. This suggests reduced asynchrony between the heart rate and vmPFC activity in contrast to other brain areas. Our findings confirm data obtained in animals describing the vmPFC as an important forebrain structure of the central autonomic network and an influence of the vmPFC in the cortical generation of efferent vagal activity. This finding needs to be investigated in diseases with known suppression of efferent vagal modulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | high |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it