MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peatlands and the Carbon Cycle

2008· article· en· W2053979468 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Kelman Wieder, Josep G. Canadell, Juul Limpens, Tim R. Moore, Nigel T. Roulet, Gabriela Schaepman‐Strub

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Ecological Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBorealCarbon cycleEnvironmental scienceSubarctic climateSoil carbonClimate changeEarth system scienceBogGreenhouse gasPhysical geographyEcosystemEcologyGeographyEarth scienceSoil waterGeologySoil scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatlands and the Carbon Cycle—from Local Processes to Global Implications. The First International Symposium on Carbon in Peatland, held at Wageningen, The Netherlands, on 15–18 April 2007 〈http://www.peatnet.siu.edu/CC07MainPage.html〉 Boreal and subarctic peatland ecosystems cover ~3% of the earth's land surface and store 15–30% of the world's soil carbon (200–400 Pg) as peat, which constitutes a greater soil C density per square meter than any other terrestrial ecosystem. This large C pool, in addition to carbon in arctic soils, lies at higher latitudes that will experience significant climate change over the next century. Tropical peatlands also contain large C reservoirs, the stability of which is threatened by ongoing land use change. At the 2005 Ecological Society of America/INTECOL meeting in Montreal, PEATNET (an NSF-supported Research Coordination Network) extended a general invitation for workshop proposals on peatlands. A small workshop to focus on peatland C cycling, proposed by Juul Limpens and Gabriela Schaepman-Strub, morphed into a meeting with 180 participants from 18 countries. The meeting goals were: (1) to advance our understanding of peatland C cycling through integration across disciplines and research approaches, and (2) to move toward a synthetic picture of the past, present, and future role of peatlands in the global C cycle and climate system, recognizing the potential for large feedbacks as consequences of projected changes in climate and in management and land use patterns. To foster a common understanding, plenary presentations introduced larger poster sessions on thematic areas including ecosystem biogeochemistry, microbial, plant, ecosystem, and landscape ecology, ecohydrology, paleoecology, and climate modeling, and large-scale assessment through spatial upscaling. Examples from boreal, subarctic, and cool temperate peatland research dominated the meeting, but there were also a few presentations on tropical and arctic systems. Common themes ran through the meeting. The presence of massive peat deposits is a testament to the long-term historical function of peatlands as net sinks for atmospheric carbon, and hence to global cooling on millennial scales. Nonetheless, the contemporary net C sink in individual peatlands displays a large interannual variability, and more broadly there may be geographic differences and differences among peatland types in the C sink strength. Whether peatlands globally function as a net carbon sink today remains uncertain. When methane emissions and their associated radiative forcing are considered, the magnitude and direction of peatlands' influence on climate is even less certain. Accumulating evidence indicates that peatland C balances are strongly influenced by drought, water table drawdown, and enhanced atmospheric N deposition, in some cases diminishing the size of the net C sink, or converting a peatland to a source of atmospheric C. Two challenges emerged from the meeting: (1) effective upscaling of net CO2 and CH4 emissions from plots and sites to regional and global scales, and (2) integration of peatlands into coupled carbon–climate modeling efforts. Most of the land surface schemes of global climate models that now include a formal representation of the C cycle do not include a realistic representation of the organic soils of peatlands. A few groups are working on this integration, but peatland researchers need to develop closer collaborations with the carbon–climate community to effectively incorporate peatlands into the next generation of earth system models. This integration needs to link peatland CO2 and CH4 cycling with ecohydrology, changing temperature regimes, changing atmospheric N deposition, ongoing permafrost melt, and fire impacts, the effects of which may differ among peatland types. PEATNET is sponsoring a workshop on Why is there Peat?, which will be held at Villanova University, 26–29 March 2008. The Second International Symposium on Carbon in Peatlands will be held in Prague, The Czech Republic, on 16–19 May 2009. Check the PEATNET web site for updates 〈http://www.peatnet.siu.edu/〉 Information from the First International Symposium on Carbon in Peatlands is being disseminated through a special issue in the European Geosciences Union Biogeosciences Interactive Open Access Journal 〈http://www.biogeosciences.net/special_issue30.html〉

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Ecological Society of AmericaSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207