MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Babies Are Still Dying of SIDS

2013· article· en· W2054001570 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Matthews

Bibliographic record

VenueAJN American Journal of Nursing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSudden infant death syndromeTragedy (event)LegislationIntervention (counseling)SAFERPublic healthHealth careMedicineNursingFamily medicinePsychologyGerontologyPolitical scienceCriminologyPediatricsPsychiatryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OVERVIEW: The following account of a devastating, preventable death helped change licensing regulations and brought about a safer sleep environment for all infants in licensed child-care facilities in Arkansas. Coauthor Andrea Moore responded to her own personal and family tragedy with a determination to save lives by reducing risk and promoting public awareness of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). She teamed up with coauthor Rebecca Matthews, a community health nurse, and Rebecca's husband, pediatrician David Matthews, president of the Arkansas chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, to initiate a four-year public health intervention. This article provides information on SIDS, suggests ways that nurses can help educate caregivers and contribute to the prevention of SIDS, and details the progress of the team's educational initiative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJN American Journal of NursingSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207