MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054011241 · doi:10.1139/b00-010

New cuticular morphotypes of <i>Cordaites principalis</i> from the Canadian Carboniferous Maritimes Basin

2000· article· en· W2054011241 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Erwin L. Zodrow, Zbynek Šimunek, Arden R. Bashforth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaČeská geologická službaMemorial University of NewfoundlandGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsCarboniferousNova scotiaCuticle (hair)TaxonTaxonomy (biology)BiologyPaleontologyStructural basinBayBotanyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossil cuticles were extracted from leaves attributed to Cordaites principalis (Germar) Geinitz (Cordaitales) that were collected from Upper Carboniferous strata in Nova Scotia (Sydney and Stellarton sub-basins) and in Newfoundland (Bay St. George sub-basin). The quality of the cuticular preservation is directly related to the thermal maturity and the grain size and angularity of sediments entombing the fossil leaves. Detailed transmitted light and scanning electron microscopy of the cuticles revealed that five distinct cuticular morphotypes could be recognized, demonstrating the variability in epidermal morphology of leaves belonging to one taxon. Two morphotypes show dissimilar and discrete epidermal characteristics, whereas three morphotypes form, more or less, a morphological continuum. Comparison with cuticles from Euramerican and Angaran floral provinces suggests that only one morphotype is in common with cuticles described from Europe, while four morphotypes are new for the Carboniferous.Key words: cuticle, Cordaites, Carboniferous, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207