MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054050828 · doi:10.1002/pse.148

Model analysis of time‐dependent stresses and deformations of structural concrete

2003· article· en· W2054050828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Structural Engineering and Materials · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringCreepShrinkageDeflection (physics)CurvatureFlowchartCompatibility (geochemistry)ReinforcementComputer scienceMaterials scienceComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a model method for predicting the immediate and time‐dependent strains and stresses in concrete structures with or without prestressing. The time‐dependent parameters that enter the analysis include creep and shrinkage of concrete and relaxation of the prestressing reinforcement. The method is based on analysis of strain distribution in individual sections by satisfying equilibrium and compatibility. The method presented is comprehensive; it applies to concrete structures reinforced with steel or fibre‐reinforced polymers, and to composite sections comprising concrete and structural steel parts. Calculation of the central deflection and end rotations of a straight member from curvature values at a number of equally spaced sections is illustrated. Available computer programs for use in the time‐dependent analysis are briefly described. The analysis steps are demonstrated by a flowchart and by numerical examples. The model analysis is verified by comparisons with published experimental results. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it