MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054093340 · doi:10.1139/v02-113

Ab initio and DFT conformational analysis of selected flavones: 5,7-dihydroxyflavone (chrysin) and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone

2002· article· en· W2054093340 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ken S. Lau, Athena Mantas, Gregory A. Chass, F.H. Ferretti, Mario R. Estrada, Graziela Zamarbide, Imre G. Csizmadia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsChemistryChrysinFlavonesAb initioMoleculeSteric effectsStereochemistryFlavonoidHydrogen bondRing (chemistry)Computational chemistryOrganic chemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ab initio and DFT conformational analysis was performed on the flavone derivatives chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone; 2-phenyl-5,7-dihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one) and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (2-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one). The structural features required for optimal stabilization in each molecule were identified. It was discovered that sparsely placed hydroxyl groups, particularly with hydrogen bond-like interactions, resulted in lowering the potential energy minimum for the molecules. It was also noted that one of the factors capable of destroying co-planarity was steric interference between closely placed functional groups across the phenyl and the benzo-γ-pyrane ring. Studies performed on the radical forms of the flavonoids, however, showed that the unpaired electron is confined only to the benzo-γ-pyrane ring, and not delocalized across the phenyl ring.Key words: flavonoid, flavone, chrysin, ab initio conformational analysis, anti-oxidant, free radical, 5,7-dihydroxy flavone, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207