MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054115335 · doi:10.1115/icmm2004-2419

Numerical Simulation on the Electrophoretic Motion of Multiple Particles in Microchannels

2004· article· en· W2054115335 on OpenAlex
Chunzhen Ye, Dongqing Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetosphere particle motionParticle (ecology)MechanicsElectric fieldElectrokinetic phenomenaMicrochannelPhysicsComputer simulationField (mathematics)Classical mechanicsParticle velocityMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the electrophoretic motion of multiple spheres in an aqueous electrolyte solution in a straight rectangular microchannel, where the size of the channel is close to that of the particles. This is a complicated 3-D transient process where the electric field, the flow field and the particle motion are coupled together. The objective is to numerically investigate how one particle influences the electric field and the flow field surrounding the other particle and the particle moving velocity. It is also aimed to investigate and demonstrate that the effects of particle size and electrokinetic properties on particle moving velocity. Under the assumption of thin electrical double layers, the electroosmotic flow velocity is used to describe the flow in the inner region. The model governing the electric field and the flow field in the outer region and the particle motion is developed. A direct numerical simulation method using the finite element method is adopted to solve the model. The numerical results show that the presence of one particle influences the electric field and the flow field adjacent to the other particle and the particle motion, and that this influences weaken when the separation distance becomes bigger. The particle motion is dependent on its size, with the smaller particle moving a little faster. In addition, the zeta potential of particle has an effective influence on the particle motion. For a faster particle moving from behind a slower one, numerical results show that the faster moving particle will climb and then pass the slower moving particle then two particles’ centers are not located on a line parallel to the electric field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrostatics and Colloid InteractionsFrench-language works237,207