Effect of Oestrogen Receptor Alpha and Beta Agonists on Brain <i>N</i>‐Methyl‐<scp>d</scp>‐Aspartate Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have shown the oestradiol modulation of brain N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors composed of the NR1/2B subunits. The contribution of oestrogen receptor subtypes in this oestradiol modulation of NMDA receptors and its subunits is not known. The following experiments investigated whether an oestrogenic receptor subtype is involved in the oestradiol effect on NMDA receptor specific binding and subunit mRNA levels. Ovariectomised Sprague-Dawley rats were treated 2 days after ovariectomy for 2 weeks with 17beta-oestradiol, an agonist for oestrogen receptor (ER)alpha 4,4',4''-(4-propyl-[1H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl)trisphenol (PPT) or an agonist for ER beta 2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionitrile (DPN) and compared with control vehicle-treated ovariectomised and intact rats. Uterus weights, used as a peripheral measure of oestrogenic activity, decreased after ovariectomy and increased by oestradiol and PPT but not DPN treatment. In the hippocampal CA1 oriens and CA1 radiatum, [(3)H]Ro 25-6981 specific binding, a NMDA/NR2B ligand, was decreased in ovariectomised compared to intact rats and this was prevented by 17beta-oestradiol or PPT but not DPN treatments; a similar pattern was observed in the CA2/3 and dentate gyrus but did not reach statistical significance. In situ hybridisation of the mRNA of the NMDA/2B subunit in the hippocampus CA1, CA2/3 and dentate gyrus showed a decrease in ovariectomised rats compared to controls and this was also prevented by 17beta-oestradiol and PPT but not DPN treatments. In cingulate and prefrontal cortices, ovariectomy increased [(3)H]Ro 25-6981 specific binding compared to intact controls, which was corrected by 17beta-oestradiol treatment but neither by PPT, nor DPN. In the cortical regions, the lack of effect of the ER alpha or ER beta agonist whereas 17beta-oestradiol was active, suggesting that the oestradiol modulation of cortical NMDA receptors requires both ERs or that this modulation does not involve ERs. In the hippocampus, the results obtained suggest an oestrogenic genomic modulation of NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit, implicating an ER alpha.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".