MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Calcific Myonecrosis: Case Report and Review

2001· review· en· W2054156242 on OpenAlex
Davinder S. Jassal, Merv Low, Lonny L. Ross, Manfred Zeismann, John M. Embil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCase Reports on Hematomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDebridement (dental)SurgeryDifferential diagnosisAbscessLesionPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although a rare diagnosis, with few reports in the literature, calcific myonecrosis is a diagnosis that must be entertained in individuals presenting with expanding masses in the muscle compartments occurring years after an initial injury. The authors report a previously healthy 66-year-old man with an expanding right lower extremity mass felt initially to be an abscess. Despite presumably appropriate antimicrobial therapy, the lesion continued to expand, causing pain and loss of function. The patient subsequently underwent extensive debridement and free muscle flap transfer with an excellent outcome. This patient serves to remind us that, although calcific myonecrosis is an uncommonly encountered condition, it must be maintained in the differential diagnosis of an expanding muscle compartment mass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it