On Achieving High Survivability in Virtualized Data Centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As businesses are increasingly relying on the cloud to host their services, cloud providers are striving to offer guaranteed and highly-available resources. To achieve this goal, recent proposals have advocated to offer both computing and networking resources in the form of Virtual Data Centers (VDCs). Subsequently, several attempts have been made to improve the availability of VDCs through reliability-aware resource allocation schemes and redundancy provisioning techniques. However, the research to date has not considered the heterogeneity of the underlying physical components. Specifically, it does not consider recent findings showing that failure rates and availability of data center equipments can vary significantly depending on various parameters including their types and ages. To address this limitation, in this paper we propose a High-availability Virtual Infrastructure management framework (Hi-VI) that takes into account the heterogeneity of cloud data center equipments to dynamically provision backup resources in order to ensure required VDC availability. Specifically, we propose a technique to compute the availability of a VDC that considers both (1) the heterogeneity of data center networking and computing equipments in terms of failure rates and availability, and (2) the number of redundant virtual nodes and links provisioned as backups. We then leverage this technique to propose an allocation scheme that jointly provisions resources for VDCs and backups of virtual components with the goal of achieving the required VDC availability while minimizing energy costs. Through simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework compared to heterogeneity-oblivious solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".