MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054204824 · doi:10.1063/1.2058171

Effect of structural variation on the photonic band gap in woodpile photonic crystal with body-centered-cubic symmetry

2005· article· en· W2054204824 on OpenAlexaff
Yuankun Lin, Peter R. Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonic crystalMaterials scienceYablonoviteFabricationPhotoresistBand gapHolographyPhotonicsOptoelectronicsPhotonic integrated circuitOpticsPhotonic metamaterialNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A woodpile photonic crystal template with body-centered-cubic symmetry can be fabricated by exposing the photoresist to a four-beam interference pattern or a pattern generated through a diffractive optical element. We present detailed photonic band-gap calculations for photonic structures obtained under various possible fabrication conditions. The woodpile photonic crystal has a full photonic band gap up to 19% of the gap center frequency when the photoresist template is converted into silicon. The tolerance of the band gap to deviations of the structural parameters from their optimum values indicates great flexibility of the holographic fabrication process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207