Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Studies of the Binding of a Rationally Designed Analogue of the Antimicrobial Peptide Gramicidin S to Phospholipid Bilayer Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding of the positively charged antimicrobial peptide cyclo[VKLdKVdYPLKVKLdYP] (GS14dK4) to various lipid bilayer model membranes was investigated using isothermal titration calorimetry. GS14dK4 is a diastereomeric lysine ring-size analogue of the naturally occurring antimicrobial peptide gramicidin S which exhibits enhanced antimicrobial and markedly reduced hemolytic activities compared with GS itself. Large unilamellar vesicles composed of various zwitterionic (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine [POPC]) and anionic phospholipids {1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(glycerol)] [POPG] and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phosphoserine] [POPS]}, with or without cholesterol, were used as model membrane systems. Dynamic light scattering results indicate the absence of any peptide-induced major alteration in vesicle size or vesicle fusion under our experimental conditions. The binding of GS14dK4 is significantly influenced by the surface charge density of the phospholipid bilayer and by the presence of cholesterol. Specifically, a significant reduction in the degree of binding occurs when three-fourths of the anionic lipid molecules are replaced with zwitterionic POPC molecules. No measurable binding occurs to cholesterol-containing zwitterionic vesicles, and a dramatic drop in binding is observed in the cholesterol-containing anionic POPG and POPS membranes, indicating that the presence of cholesterol markedly reduces the affinity of this peptide for phospholipid bilayers. The binding isotherms can be described quantitatively by a one-site binding model. The measured endothermic binding enthalpy (DeltaH) varies dramatically (+6.3 to +26.5 kcal/mol) and appears to be inversely related to the order of the phospholipid bilayer system. However, the negative free energy (DeltaG) of binding remains relatively constant (-8.5 to -11.5 kcal/mol) for all lipid membranes examined. The relatively small variation of negative free energy of peptide binding together with a pronounced variation of positive enthalpy produces an equally strong variation of TDeltaS (+16.2 to +35.0 kcal/mol), indicating that GS14dK4 binding to phospholipids bilayers is primarily entropy driven.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".