MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054235858 · doi:10.1016/j.hcmf.2014.01.004

A Framework for Patient-Centred Care Coordination

2014· article· en· W2054235858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David E. Mosher

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth carePsychological interventionPatient careHealthcare systemQuality (philosophy)Medical emergencyPatient portalNursingBusinessProcess managementMedicineKnowledge managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Difficulty accessing patient information, duplication of effort, and breakdowns in communication within the medical infrastructure are some of the major issues challenging the quality of care and the efficiency of the Canadian healthcare system. In addition, patients are demanding faster access to the right services, improved outcomes, and more involvement in managing their own healthcare. This article presents a framework for patient-centred care that allows healthcare providers to deliver better and faster patient interventions with treatment plans based on a patient's complete medical history. RelayHealth provides the framework for patient-centred care coordination and fully integrates patient and provider interaction at all points on the healthcare continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.018
Scholarly communication0.0170.014
Open science0.0070.016
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207