Localization of heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in the rat kidney
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are cleared, at least in part, by the kidneys through a poorly understood process. This study was undertaken to explore the mechanism of renal clearance of these drugs. Rats were given fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled UFH or LMWH intravenously. At intervals after injection, rats were euthanized and the kidneys were harvested and subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence microscopy. Both UFH and LMWH were localized to renal tubular cells and no immunoperoxidase staining or fluorescence was detected in glomeruli. Autoradiography demonstrated similar intracellular distribution of radio-labeled UFH suggesting that this phenomenon is independent of the method used to label heparin. Fluorescence in the tubules increased as a function of time after UFH injection, but reached a plateau after LMWH injection suggesting that the rate of renal tubular uptake depends on the molecular size of the heparin. When administered prior to FITC-labeled UFH or LMWH, probenecid, a renal organic anion inhibitor, decreased the renal tubular uptake of the heparins, whereas cimetidine, a renal organic cation inhibitor, had no effect. These findings suggest that renal excretion of UFH and LMWH primarily reflects tubular uptake via an organic anion transport mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".