MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054258364 · doi:10.1145/505894.505909

COTS workshop

2001· article· en· W2054258364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware engineeringEngineering managementEngineeringCertificationSystems engineeringSoftwareComputer scienceOperating systemManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In early June of 2000 a COTS Workshop entitled "Continuing Collaborations for Successful COTS Development" was held in Limerick, Ireland in conjunction with ICSE 2000. The purpose of the workshop was to collect experience reports regarding the use of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software to build systems, identify best-practices for the use of COTS software, and to establish a research agenda for those researchers interested in COTS-based software systems. This one and a half day workshop was an extension of the work begun during the workshop entitled "Ensuring Successful COTS Development" held in conjunction with ICSE '99. Results from that workshop demonstrated that there were a number of common research areas, including acquisition, planning and management, architecture and implementation, and evaluation and testing, for which researchers saw the possibility of collaboration. These areas included specific topics such as estimating the effort required to implement COTS-based systems, classification of architectural styles, and certification of COTS products for reliability and safety. The group will reconvene at ICSE'01 (www.csr.uvic.ca/icse2001) to discuss further the results achieved.The ICSE 2000 Workshop had about 26 participants and was formatted as a combination of plenary sessions and small breakout groups that worked on specific issues related to COTS-based systems. The breakout groups investigated the impact of COTS software usage in the following areas: Economic and financial issues. Requirements definition Software engineering process. Integration, maintenance and system management. Business models. Each breakout group tried to identify the current state of the art in COTS software usage as well as open questions that could provide the basis for further research in the coming years. Each group was responsible for producing a written summary of their discussions which are included, without major editing, below. A more complete description of the workshop, as well as all the participants' position papers, can be found at:http://seg.iit.nrc.ca/projects/cots/icse2000wkshp/index.html

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.283
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.283
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it