MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054270185 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3501053

Runoff Reduction Effects of Green Roofs in Vancouver, BC, Kelowna, BC, and Shanghai, P.R. China

2010· article· en· W2054270185 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Daniel Roehr, Yuewei Kong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreen roofEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffEvapotranspirationPrecipitationHydrology (agriculture)Soil conservationIrrigationWater balanceRoofGeographyMeteorologyAgronomyAgricultureGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research examines how distinct climatic conditions affect the runoff reduction functions of green roofs by comparing performance in Vancouver, BC, Kelowna, BC and Shanghai, P.R. China. To quantify the reduction in runoff volume effectuated by green roofs, both the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN), crop coefficient method and the Hargreaves-Samani method are applied in calculating the annual water gains and losses of green roofs during a year of average precipitation, using local climate data such as precipitation, evapotranspiration, and temperature. Using a soil water balance model, the research also analyzes the change in soil water content of a typical green roof with a soil depth of 150 mm, and compares the potential irrigation requirements of plants with low versus high water requirements in each of the three cities. The calculation results show that the typical green roof could reduce annual rooftop runoff by 29% in Vancouver, 55% in Shanghai, and 100% in Kelowna. Furthermore, these results illustrate the important role that soil properties, soil depth, and plant selection play in maintaining growth of plants and minimizing green roof irrigation requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207