MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054278030 · doi:10.1115/1.2735343

Kinematic and Geometric Analysis of a Pure-Rolling Epicyclic Train

2006· article· en· W2054278030 on OpenAlex
Chao Chen, Xiang Zhang, Jorge Angeles

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsReducerGear trainKinematicsMechanism (biology)BacklashTrainRing (chemistry)EngineeringGear ratioMechanical engineeringPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports an innovative design of epicyclic (planetary) cam trains based on pure-rolling contact, intended to overcome the drawbacks of gear trains, such as Coulomb friction and backlash. The kinematic relations of the mechanism with a given speed-reduction ratio are analyzed; accordingly, the profiles of the sun cam and ring cam, key elements of the mechanism, are obtained. Furthermore, the condition for undercutting avoidance of the ring cam is derived. For mechanical design, different layouts of the epicyclic cam trains are discussed for the structure and transmission optimization. Finally, an epicyclic cam-roller speed reducer is designed and prototyped.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it