MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Changes in ion content and transport during development of embryonic rainbow trout

2001· article· en· W2054293615 on OpenAlexaff
Keith Barrett, D. G. McDonald, M. J. O.'Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRainbow troutYolkHatchingEmbryoEmbryogenesisYolk sacAnimal scienceTroutIon transporterBiophysicsFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>BiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wet mass and water content of four lots of whole eggs did not change throughout embryonic development of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Eggs in all four lots accumulated Na+. Eggs in lots 2 and 4 also accumulated Ca2+ and Cl‐, whereas eggs in lot 1 showed no significant change in Ca2+ or Cl‐ and eggs in lot 3 showed no change in Cl‐and a small loss of Ca2+. Although the Na+ content of embryonic tissues increases in the later stages of development, the yolk sac content remained constant, indicating uptake of Na+ from the environment. Na+ uptake by whole eggs was non‐saturable, consistent with diffusion of Na+ across the chorion into the perivitelline fluid. Na+ uptake in dechorionated embryos was saturable, as was Ca2+ uptake by both whole eggs and dechorionated embryos, consistent with active uptake or facilitated diffusion mechanisms at the surface of embryos. Very low Ca2+ uptake rates in dechorionated embryos suggest that the Ca2+ uptake mechanism is not fully developed until after hatching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207