MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054302069 · doi:10.1109/cw.2011.44

Face Detection Using Skin Color Recursive Clustering and Recognition Using Multilinear PCA

2011· article· en· W2054302069 on OpenAlexaff
Padma Polash Paul, Md. Maruf Monwar, Marina L. Gavrilova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Facial recognition systemPrincipal component analysisComputer visionFeature (linguistics)Face (sociological concept)Feature extractionBiometricsCluster analysisMultilinear mapFeature vectorFace detectionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a robust approach for face recognition from video sequences. An automatic face detectoris employed which uses modified skin color modeling to detect human skin regions from the video sequences. The presence or absence of face in each region is verified by means of height width proportion and a Neural Network based template matching scheme. The obtained face images are then projected onto a feature space, defined by Multilinear Principal Component Analysis (MPCA), to produce the biometric feature template. Recognition is performed by projecting anew image onto the feature spaces by the MPCA that generalizes not only the classical PCA solution but also a number of the so-called 2-D PCA algorithms and then classifying the face by comparing its position in the feature spaces with the positions of known individuals. The proposed method is applicable to security systems, secure human computer interaction, visual communication systems (secure video conferencing) and virtual world environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207