MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054303704 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2010.5649342

Remote sensing image synthesis

2010· article· en· W2054303704 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRemote sensingImage (mathematics)Computer visionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For remote sensing data, the testing analysis tools is difficult since the ground-truth data are not available in many cases. To address this issue, a novel method for image synthesis is presented for use as a evaluation test-bed. Given the scale-dependent, non-stationary nature of remotely sensed data, a new modeling approach that combines a resolution-oriented hierarchical method with a regional label-oriented binary tree structure is introduced to synthesize such complex data. In this paper, we are proposing on first synthesizing a label field, which contains the complex structural characteristics, then synthesizing the texture based on the generated label field for a more accurate modeling. Experimental results using operational RADARSAT SAR sea-ice image data show that the proposed method is capable of modeling complex, nonstationary scale structures, thus making it well-suitable to produce reliable, realistic remote sensing imagery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it