A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Distal Radius Fractures With Metaphyseal Displacement but Without Joint Incongruity: Closed Reduction and Casting Versus Closed Reduction, Spanning External Fixation, and Optional Percutaneous K-wires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare closed reduction and casting with closed reduction and external fixation with optional K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Multicenter study at 3 University teaching hospitals. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 113 skeletally mature patients with distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement, but without joint incongruity, were randomized to receive 1 of 2 standardized treatment protocols. Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. INTERVENTION: Closed reduction and casting (n = 59) or closed reduction and external fixation (n = 54). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Upper extremity function was measured using upper extremity MFA domain scores, overall Jebsen Taylor scores, and pinch and grip strength tests. Global function and pain were measured using the SF-36. Radiographic evaluation and range of motion were documented. RESULTS: Upper extremity MFA scores, Jebsen Taylor scores, SF-36 bodily pain scores, and grip strength improved significantly during the first year for all patients. By 2 years, mean Jebsen Taylor scores and SF 36 bodily pain scores for patients in both groups were similar to scores for normal age- and gender-matched population controls. At all points, there was a trend for better function in the external fixation; however, this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend for better length and palmar tilt restoration with external fixation. CONCLUSIONS: For distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but with a congruous joint, there exists a trend for better functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes when treated by immediate external fixation and optional K-wire fixation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".