MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054331765 · doi:10.1159/000174916

Nitrates for Myocardial Salvage in the 1990s

2008· review· en· W2054331765 on OpenAlex
B. I. Jugdutt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-dose intravenous nitroglycerin infusion for the first 48 h is becoming routine in the management of acute myocardial infarction in North America. It is most widely used as primary therapy in patients admitted more than 6 h after acute infarction. Such therapy has been shown to limit infarct size, infarct complications and remodeling. However, it is being applied increasingly more as an adjunct before, during and after thrombolytic therapy. Several trials are underway to test the effectiveness of more prolonged therapy, with early intravenous nitroglycerin followed by buccal or oral formulations for several weeks, in further limitation of ventricular remodeling, dilatation, aneurysm formation and in preserving function. Nitrates may prove to be a useful adjunct or alternative to angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for long-term therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it