MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054332678 · doi:10.1002/prot.20832

NMR structure of the conserved novel‐fold protein TA0743 from <i>Thermoplasma acidophilum</i>

2005· article· en· W2054332678 on OpenAlexaff
B. Kim, Jinwon Jung, Eunmi Hong, Adelinda Yee, C.H. Arrowsmith, Weontae Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersKorea Science and Engineering Foundation
KeywordsThermoplasma acidophilumBiochemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyAmino acidAffinity chromatographyHistidinePeptide sequenceBiologyProtein purificationSize-exclusion chromatographyChemistryStereochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermoplasma acidophilum1 has one of the smallest known archaeal genomes. This organism is a thermo-acidophilic archaeon that is surrounded by only a plasma membrane. TA0743 is a 122-residue conserved hypothetical protein found in Thermoplasma acidophilum. Because neither functional nor structural information is available for this protein, the solution structure of TA0743 has been determined by NMR spectroscopy. Based on the solution structure and the amino acid sequence analysis, we propose that TA0743 is an uncharacterized protein with a novel structural fold. Therefore, our structure may serve as a starting point to study the structure–function of proteins with a similar fold in various species. The ORF of TA0743 was cloned into the expression vector pET-15b and was expressed in the Eschericha coli BL21 (DE3) strain (Novagen Inc.). The vector contains 18 extra amino acids with a histidine affinity tag (His-tag) at the N-terminus. Cells were grown in M9 media with 15NH4Cl and 13C-gluscose in order to produce an 15N/13C-labeled protein. Cells were grown at 37°C until an OD600 of 0.5 and then induced with 1 mM IPTG for 7h at 25°C. The protein was purified on a metal affinity column. The protein sample was further purified using gel filtration chromatography (Superdex 75). Finally, the protein was concentrated to 1.6 mM in 50 mM potassium phosphate, 0.1% NaN3, and 90% H2O/10% D2O solution (pH 6.5). All NMR spectra were recoded at 25°C on a Bruker AVANCE DRX500 spectrometer equipped with a pulse-field gradient triple-resonance probe or on a VARIAN UNITY600 spectrometer. NMR data were processed by the NMRPipe2 with linear prediction to double the number of points in the indirect dimensions for digital resolution improvement. The spectra were analyzed with Sparky.3 The backbone resonance assignments of TA0743 were performed with the HNCACB and CBCA(CO)NH spectra and confirmed with the HNCA4 spectrum. Backbone resonance assignments were analyzed with program MARS.5 Carbonyl carbons were assigned with HNCO spectrum and side-chain proton resonances were assigned with HCCH-TOCSY and (H)CCH-TOCSY spectra. 3D 15N-edited NOESY and 13C-edited NOESY spectra were acquired for NOE constraints. For structure calculation, the NOE peak assignment was obtained by both manual and automatic peak picking procedure. Backbone dihedral angle restraints were also derived from chemical shifts of the 1Hα, 13Cα, 13Cβ, CO, and NH using TALOS.6 The dihedral angle restraints were used for structure calculation using CYANA 2.0.7 A total of 1422 NOEs, 84 distance for hydrogen bonds, and 168 dihedral angle restraints were used for structure calculation. From 100 calculated structures, the 20 structures with the lowest target function energy were selected and finally analyzed by the program MOLMOL8 and pyMOL.9 The 20 final structures are well-converged with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.51 Å for ordered structural regions and 0.78 Å for all of the backbone heavy atoms [Fig. 1(A)]. The structural statistics associated with the 20 final structures are listed in Table I. TA0743 is determined as a two-layered α/β-sandwich structure [Fig. 1(B)] and the molecular topology is a βαββααβα fold. One layer comprises three α-helices [Gly14-Asp30 (α1), Pro60-Arg80 (α2), and Tyr83-Asp92 (α3)], while the other surface is composed of a four-stranded β-sheet with 1(↓), 3(↑), 2(↓), and 4(↓) order. Three α-helices (α1, α2, and α3) are located on the same side of the β-sheet [Fig. 1(B)]. The α3-helix, which is not connected to β-strands, is interconnected to α2. Two other helices (α2 and α3) form an HTH motif at an angle of about 90° to each other. This motif might provide a binding surface for interacting molecule. Interestingly, compared to residues in other secondary structural region, a number of charged polar residues (α2: Arg68, Lys69, Lys70, Arg72, Lys74, Arg80, and α3: Lys89, His91) are found near HTH region, suggesting that this region is also of functional importance. NMR solution structure of TA0743. (A) A stereo-view of the superposition of the final 20 structures over the energy-minimized average structure. (B) Ribbon diagram showing a molecular topology of TA0743. The β-strands and α-helices are shown in green and yellow, respectively. A homology search using the program DALI10 within the Protein Data Bank11 indicates that TA0743 shares weak similarity with 54 different proteins, however, no meaningful match of structural fold to TA0743 was detected from CATH.12 These results imply that TA0743 would be an uncharacterized protein with a novel structural fold. From BLAST13 database search, three proteins were identified with over 40% sequence identity with TA0743: NP111379 (Thermoplasma volcanium), EAM93965 (Ferroplasma acidarmanus), and YP023413 (Picrophilus torridus) (Fig. 2). The functions of all of these proteins are also unknown. Therefore, the structure of TA0743 could potentially serve as a model to characterize the structure–function of this novel fold family of proteins in other species. [Note: Both backbone and side-chain chemical shifts for TA0743 have been deposited in the BioMagResBank (accession code: BMRB-6755). Coordinates for the 20 structures and average energy-minimized structure have been deposited in the RCSB PDB with accession code 2ABY.] Sequence alignment of TA0743 from Thermoplasma acidophilum with three homologous proteins: NP 111379 (Thermoplasma volcanium), EAM93965 (Ferroplasma acidarmanus), and YP 023413 (Picrophilus torridus). The secondary structure of TA0743 determined by NMR is shown on the top of the sequences. All conserved residues are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207