FRECUENCIA DE PRESENTACIÓN DE INESTABILIDAD LUMBOSACRA EN CANINOS LABRADOR RETRIEVER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of lumbosacral instability in Labrador Retriever dogs older than six months of age, and to determine its association with the variables sex, age, body weight, radiological signs, and clinical signs of lumbosacral pain. The disease was detected by radiographic evaluation. Sixty dogs were randomly selected and distributed according to sex (30 per sex), age (3 groups) and body weight (3 categories). The frequency of lumbosacral instability was 75.0% (45/60). The females were most affected (86.7%, 26/30) and male:female ratio was 1:1.4. None statistical association was found due to age. Obese animals (>15% overweight on the limit of the standard) showed greater frequency (87.5%, 21/24). The most frequent radiological sign was the ventral subluxation of the sacrum relative to L7 (75.0%, 45/60). Transrectal palpation allowed the highest detection of lumbosacral pain (80.0%, 45/60). The radiological evaluation of the disease showed a high degree of concordance with the evaluation of the lumbosacral pain (p<0.05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".