MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054427335 · doi:10.1103/physreve.82.041304

Collapse of a rectangular well in a quasi-two-dimensional granular bed

2010· article· en· W2054427335 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon J. de Vet, Bereket Yohannes, K. M. Hill, John R. de Bruyn

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBayworld Centre for Research and Education
KeywordsDissipationKinetic energyMechanicsParticle image velocimetryDiscrete element methodPhysicsGranular materialAspect ratio (aeronautics)Flow (mathematics)GeologyClassical mechanicsGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on an experimental and numerical study of the collapse under gravity of a rectangular well in a quasi-two-dimensional granular bed. For comparison, we also perform experiments on the collapse of a single vertical step. Experiments are conducted in a vertical Hele-Shaw cell, which allows the flow to be recorded from the side using high-speed video. If the rectangular well is sufficiently narrow, the collapsing sidewalls collide at the center of the well and the dynamics of the collapse are dependant on the aspect ratio of the initial well. We follow the evolution of the free surface from the video images, and use particle image velocimetry to determine the subsurface velocity field. From these data, the potential and kinetic energy of the system are calculated. We observe two stages to the collapse flow: an initial gravity-dominated stage, during which the kinetic energy increases, and a later dissipation-dominated phase during which the kinetic energy decreases. We find that although both the width and depth of the depression that remains after the well has collapsed depend on the initial aspect ratio, the surface profiles are self-similar; that is, the shape of the final profile is independent of the aspect ratio of the initial well. We model the collapse of the well using a depth-averaged continuum model with basal friction and with a discrete element model. Both models give results which agree well with experiment. The discrete element model indicates that friction between the particles is the most important source of dissipation over the course of the collapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207