MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054444090 · doi:10.1021/jp052778i

Mesitylthio-Oligothiophenes in Various Redox States. Molecular and Electronic Views as Offered by Spectroscopy and Theory

2005· article· en· W2054444090 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Casado, Marek Z. Zgierski, Robin G. Hicks, Daniel J. T. Myles, Pedro M. Viruela, Enrique Ortı́, M. Carmen Ruiz Delgado, V. Hernández, Juan T. López Navarrete

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyChemistryDicationDensity functional theoryTetramerRadical ionRedoxElectronic structureAbsorption spectroscopyComputational chemistryHybrid functionalPhotochemistryCrystallographyMoleculeIonInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of alpha,omega-bis(mesitylthio)oligothiophenes of various chain lengths and with different side substitution patterns have been studied in their oxidized states by means of electron absorption and Raman spectroscopies in combination with theory in the framework of the density functional theory. Upon chemical oxidation, stable radical cations, dications, and even radical trications are generated. Longer chain lengths better stabilize higher oxidation states. The tetramer can be easily converted to the dication, and a trication can be obtained for the ethylenedioxy derivative. The alpha,omega-sulfur atoms are actively involved in the formation of the charged species and exert a favorable tuning of their electronic structure. Raman spectra provide experimental evidence of the attainment of quinoidal structures within the conjugated path, initially heteroaromatic, with different extension as a function of the p-doping level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207