MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054461703 · doi:10.2118/165531-ms

Optimal Application Conditions of Solvent Injection into Oilsands to Minimize the Effect of Asphaltene Deposition: An Experimental Investigation

2013· article· en· W2054461703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAll Days · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphalteneSolventAlkaneHydrocarbonHexanePropaneLight crude oilChemical engineeringOil sandsDecaneChemistryMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyOrganic chemistryGeologyComposite materialAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solvent injection into heavy-oil reservoirs is quite complex on account of the asphaltene destabilization that occurs due to the changes in temperature, pressure, and solvent type dissolved in oil. As a result of this destabilization, the asphaltene precipitates, flocculates, and eventually plugs the pores in the reservoir due to the formation of asphaltene clusters. In solvent applications, light molecular weight hydrocarbon solvents are preferred because of their high diffusion coefficient; but, as the carbon number of n-alkane solvents decreases, asphaltene precipitation increases. Therefore, the selection of the solvent and application condition is highly critical in cold and thermally-aided solvent applications. In this research, low carbon number n-alkane (propane, n-hexane and n-decane) injection into sand pack systems saturated with heavy-oil (87651 cp) was evaluated at different pressure conditions that are applicable to typical Canadian oilsands reservoirs (100-300 psi) and temperatures (25-120 °C). First, the asphaltene behavior of different solvents at different pressures and temperatures were studied through deasphalting work in a pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) cell. Based on the quantitative (amount of asphaltene precipitated) and qualitative (microscopic images of asphaltene clusters) observations, the characteristics of asphaltene were classified in terms of their shape, size, and amount for different oil/solvent types, pressure, and temperature. Continually, the same n-alkane solvents and heavy-oil were used in gravity drainage recovery experiments on unconsolidated sands. 2-D visual (Hele-Shaw type) and 3-D (cylindrical) sand pack experiments were carried out at the same temperatures and pressure conditions used for the PVT experiments. The asphaltene precipitated in the sand pack and in the produced oil was collected, and the standard SARA analysis was applied to determine the optimal operating conditions yielding the highest recoveries with minimal pore plugging. Moreover, the pore plugging process was analyzed through the visual inspection of 3-D sand pack experiments and the 2-D visual model using microscopic visualization and cross-checked against oil recovery rate. The asphaltene characteristics and concentration were evaluated using the microscope visualization and refractive index values, respectively. Eventually, optimal application conditions for solvent and thermally-aided solvent injection were listed for a wide range of heavy-oil and solvent types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it