Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note from the Editor Rose-Marie Déchaine, Editor The upcoming 50th anniversary of the Canadian Journal of Linguistics provides an opportunity to review its past achievements in order to better prepare its future. This issue re-instates a past practice of having a review article in its pages, namely Denis Bouchard's critique of Roy Harris's Saussure and his interpreters. The last such review article was published some 10 years ago and penned by none other than André Martinet. This return of this feature, suggested by our Book Review Editor Paul Pupier, is a welcome one.1 We are also maintaining the tradition of having certain issues highlight a specific theme, an initiative begun by previous Editors of the Journal. The goal is to showcase Canadian scholarship across a broad range of areas, which is part of the Journal's mandate. Upcoming thematic issues will focus on topics such as Language and Identity, Grammar at the Interface, Canadian English, and Wakashan Languages. The latter is dear to our hearts, as it represents a publishing first: this volume will be the first publication devoted to Wakashan Languages. We are also planning thematic issues on Hispanic Linguistics, Audio-Visual Speech Processing, and Acadian French. This gives a sense of the breadth and depth of scholarly activity in Canada. We encourage anyone who has an interest in preparing a thematic issue to contact the Editor of the Journal. In addition to renewing with the past, we are also looking to the future. In upcoming issues, you can expect to see short articles in a squib-like format, as well as regular commentaries on the state of the field. In addition to changes in content, you will see changes in form: the outside cover of the Journal is being redesigned; the new design will be in-augurated in volume 50. To commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Journal, we have commissioned papers from leading scholars in Canada across a wide range of research areas. In addition to traditional areas such as Phonetics, Morphology, Syntax, and Semantics, we have also invited contributions in the areas of Anthropological Linguistics, Historical Linguistics, Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Sociolinguistics. Canadian scholarship is already recognized for its leading role in these areas, and the Journal is pleased to showcase the research activity that is taking place in Canada. [End Page 245] Note de la rédactrice La Revue canadienne de linguistique célébrera bientôt son 50ième anniversaire, ce qui nous offre l'occasion de revoir les réussites du passé afin de mieux préparer son avenir. Ainsi, dans le présent numéro, nous publions un compte-rendu sous forme d'article : la critique de Denis Bouchard de Saussure and his interpreters de Roy Harris. Le dernier compte-rendu sous une telle forme remonte à plus de 10 ans et avait été rédigé par nul autre qu'André Martinet. Le retour de cette initiative très appréciée nous a été suggéré par Paul Pupier, notre rédacteur de comptes-rendus.2 Nous maintenons aussi la tradition de consacrer certains numéros à des thèmes spécifiques, initiative que nous devons au rédacteurs précédents de la Revue. Ces numéros thématiques mettent en évidence la recherche canadienne dans divers domaines, ce qui entre dans le mandat de la Revue. Les numéros thématiques qui sont en préparation porteront sur des sujets aussi variés que la langue et l'identité, la grammaire à l'interface, l'anglais canadien et la famille des langues wakashannes (parlées sur la côte du nord-ouest). Ce dernier numéro nous tient particulièrement à coeur, puisqu'il représente une grande première dans l'histoire de l'édition : ce volume sera la première publication d'un ouvrage consacré aux langues wakashannes. Nous planifions aussi des numéros thématiques sur la linguistique hispanique, le traitement audio-visuel de la parole et le français acadien. Ceci donne une indication de l'ampleur et de la profondeur des activités de recherche au Canada. Nous vous encourageons à contacter la rédactrice de la Revue...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.093 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".