MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054491592 · doi:10.1055/s-2003-38966

Eine neue Methode zur Objektivierung der subjektiven Beschwerden

2003· article· de· W2054491592 on OpenAlexaff
Max Lüscher

Bibliographic record

VenueErfahrungsheilkunde · 2003
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistic research and analysis
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eine primär physiologisch ausgerichtete naturwissenschaftliche Medizin ignoriert meist die psychische Ursache. Sie taxiert die am häufigsten auftretenden Erkrankungen als „nur subjektive Beschwerden”. An Stelle der aufwendigen und schwierigen verbalen Befragung bietet die Farb-Diagnostik einen raschen und differenzierten Einblick in den psycho-vegetativen Zustand. Dabei wird mittels der Bevorzugung und Ablehnung von standardisierten Testfarben der emotionale Zustand des Patienten gemessen. Auf diese Weise deckt die Farb-Diagnostik die emotionale Ursache von psycho-vegetativen Störungen auf und ermöglicht dadurch eine gezielte Therapie-Strategie, besonders mit der Homöopathie und den Mineralsalzen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: Other design
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueErfahrungsheilkundeSame topicLinguistic research and analysisFrench-language works237,207