MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054491592 · doi:10.1055/s-2003-38966

Eine neue Methode zur Objektivierung der subjektiven Beschwerden

2003· article· de· W2054491592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueErfahrungsheilkunde · 2003
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistic research and analysis
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eine primär physiologisch ausgerichtete naturwissenschaftliche Medizin ignoriert meist die psychische Ursache. Sie taxiert die am häufigsten auftretenden Erkrankungen als „nur subjektive Beschwerden”. An Stelle der aufwendigen und schwierigen verbalen Befragung bietet die Farb-Diagnostik einen raschen und differenzierten Einblick in den psycho-vegetativen Zustand. Dabei wird mittels der Bevorzugung und Ablehnung von standardisierten Testfarben der emotionale Zustand des Patienten gemessen. Auf diese Weise deckt die Farb-Diagnostik die emotionale Ursache von psycho-vegetativen Störungen auf und ermöglicht dadurch eine gezielte Therapie-Strategie, besonders mit der Homöopathie und den Mineralsalzen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it