An update on the hydroxyl airglow temperature record from the Auroral Station in Adventdalen, Svalbard (1980–2005)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports on the daily mesospheric winter temperature series derived from ground-based spectral measurements of the hydroxyl airglow layer from the Auroral Station in Adventdalen near Longyearbyen, Svalbard (78°N, 15°E). Temperature estimates from the four latest seasons (2001–2002 to 2004–2005) have been added to the series reported by Sigernes et al. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A9), 1342 (2003). Lomb–Scargle periodogram analyses were performed on both hourly and daily average temperatures to look for significant periods. From the daily means, ∼24 and ∼26 d oscillations that are consistent with a solar rotation modulation of the atmosphere were identified. Analyses of the hourly averaged data did not reveal any considerable diurnal and semidiurnal periods in the temperatures. The 2003–2004 mesopause winter was one of the warmest reported over Svalbard during the last 25 years. It is common to observe within a few days temperature fluctuations in the range 20–40 K. Some years show far less variation than others. The overall daily average winter temperature is 209 K. The annual mean winter temperatures show a slightly positive temperature trend (+0.2 ± 0.1 K/year), on the verge of being a statistically significant change in the winter mesospheric temperatures over Svalbard.PACS Nos.: 92.60.hc, 07.20.Dt, 93.30.Sq, 92.60.hw
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".