MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054532536 · doi:10.1071/rdv19n1ab383

383 EFFECT OF TIME OF OVULATION INDUCTION BY GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE OR PITUITARY LUTEINIZING HORMONE ON OVA/EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN SUPERSTIMULATED BEEF COWS INSEMINATED AT A FIXED TIME

2006· article· en· W2054532536 on OpenAlex
P. Chesta, R. Tríbulo, H. Tríbulo, E. Balla, Pietro Sampaio Baruselli, G. A. Bó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuteinizing hormoneOvulationAnimal scienceInternal medicineGonadotropin-releasing hormoneBeef cattleBiologyEndocrinologyAndrologyHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown than it is possible to AI embryo donors at a fixed time (FTAI) by removing the progestin-releasing device at the time of the last FSH treatment and inducing ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) at either 12 h (dairy cows: Bos indicus) or 24 h (beef cows: Bos taurus) after device removal (Bo et al. 2006 Theriogenology 65, 89–101). An experiment was designed to determine the best interval from device removal to GnRH or pLH treatment in Angus (beef cow) donors. Red Angus donors (43 cows and 56 heifers) were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. On Day 0, all donors received a DIB vaginal device (Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17ß and 50 mg progesterone (P4; Laboratorio Rio de Janeiro, Argentina) IM. Superstimulatory treatments were initiated on Day 4, with a total dose of 320 mg (cows) or 200 mg (heifers) NIH-FSH-P1 of Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in twice daily IM injections over 4 days. All cows received prostaglandin-F treatment (150 µg d-cloprostenol; Bioprost; Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) on Day 6 (AM and PM); DIB devices were removed with the last Folltropin-V treatment on Day 7 PM. Donors received 0.050 mg GnRH (Lecirelina; Gonasyn; Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) or 25 mg Armour pLH (Lutropin-V; Bioniche) 12 h (Day 8 AM) or 24 h (Day 8 PM) later and were FTAI 12 and 24 h after GnRH or pLH. Ova/embryos were collected nonsurgically and classified according to IETS recommendations on Day 15 AM for donors receiving GnRH or pLH on Day 8 AM and on Day 15 PM for those receiving GnRH or pLH on Day 8 PM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Although there was no effect of induction agent (GnRH vs. pLH; P > 0.2) and/or interaction between the induction agent and the time of treatment (P > 0.13) on ova/embryo production, treatment with GnRH or pLH on Day 8 AM (i.e. 12 h after DIB removal) resulted in a significantly lower (P < 0.05) number of fertilized ova and Grades 1 and 2 embryos than treatment on Day 8 PM (i.e. 24 h after DIB removal; Table 1). It was concluded that GnRH and pLH were equally efficacious for inducing ovulation in superstimulated donors that were fixed-time AI. Furthermore, a 24-h interval from progestin device removal to GnRH or pLH administration was preferable for Bos taurus beef donors. Table 1. Ova/embryo production in Angus donors treated with GnRH or pLH 12 or 24 h after removal of a progestin-releasing device and FTAI 12 and 24 h later

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it