MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054536914 · doi:10.4161/psb.21930

Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis through protein degradation

2012· review· en· W2054536914 on OpenAlexafffund
Wendy J. Lyzenga, Sophia L. Stone

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Signaling & Behavior · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUbiquitinBiologyProteasomeProtein degradationBiochemistryEthyleneProtein biosynthesisDegradation (telecommunications)BiosynthesisEnzymeFunction (biology)Ubiquitin ligaseCell biologyPlant hormoneLimitingCatalysisGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The function of hormones during plant growth, development and response to environmental stresses relies heavily upon the actions of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), which selectively degrades numerous proteins. Synthesis of ethylene, a growth and stress hormone, is regulated in part by the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the rate-limiting enzymatic protein aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS). Regulation of ACS protein stability, and therefore ethylene production, is mediated by non-catalytic sequences within the C-terminal extension of many ACS proteins. In this review we provide a brief overview of the E3 ligases that target ACS proteins for degradation and discuss how post-translational modification of the C-terminal extensions influence protein stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Signaling & BehaviorSame topicPlant responses to water stressFrench-language works237,207