Resolution of sertraline with <i>(R)</i>‐mandelic acid: Chiral discrimination mechanism study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chiral discrimination mechanism in the resolution of sertraline with mandelic acid was investigated by examining the weak intermolecular interactions (such as hydrogen bond, CH/π, and van der Waals interactions) and molecular packing difference in crystal structures of the resulting diastereomeric salts. A new one-dimensional chain-like hydrogen-bonding network and unique supramolecular packing mode are disclosed. The investigation demonstrated that stable hydrogen-bonding pattern, herringbone-like arrangement of aromatic rings, and planar boundary surface in the hydrophobic region are the three most important structural characteristics expected in less soluble diastereomeric salts. The existence and magnitude of hydrogen bond, CH/π interaction, and van der Waals interaction related to three characteristic structures, determine the stability of diastereomeric salt. The hydrogen bond is not necessarily the dominant factor while the synergy and optimization of all weak intermolecular interactions attribute to the chiral recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it