Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The motion of a single gas bubble rising steadily in an uncontaminated Newtonian viscous fluid of infinite extent is reviewed. Using experimental data gathered from the literature over the past century, a data bunk is set up for bubble velocities as a function of their diameters. These data provided a very broad range of liquid properties and bubble hydrodynamic regimes as density (722–1,380 kg/m 3 ), viscosity (2.2×10 −4 −18 Pa·s), surface tension (15.9–91.0 mN/m), Reynolds number (1.9×10 −7 −1.1 × 10 4 ), and Morton number (1.0×10 −11 −1.0×10 7 ). From a dimensional analysis, a single equation is proposed to predict bubble velocities. The simplicity and good precision over the whole range of parameters facilitate its use in design calculations of chemical engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it