MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054583152 · doi:10.4161/viru.1.6.13801

<i>Campylobacter jejuni</i>free oligosaccharides: Function and fate

2010· article· en· W2054583152 on OpenAlexafffund
Harald Nothaft, Xin Liu, Jianjun Li, Christine M. Szymanski

Bibliographic record

VenueVirulence · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics Centre
FundersAlberta Glycomics Centre
KeywordsPeriplasmic spaceCampylobacter jejuniBiochemistryBiologyAsparagineBacterial outer membraneGlycoproteinGlycobiologyGlycanMicrobiologyEnzymeBacteriaEscherichia coliGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Campylobacter jejuni N-linked protein glycosylation pathway produces a heptasaccharide that is added to >65 periplasmic and membrane proteins and is also released into the periplasm as the free oligosaccharide (fOS). The fOS is a novel soluble component of the C. jejuni periplasmic space that exists in 10-fold greater quantities than its asparagine-linked counterpart. Structurally, fOS is the same heptasaccharide that is found attached to asparagine residues on C. jejuni glycoproteins and both glycans are cleaved from the undecaprenylpyrophosphate anchor by the previously identified oligosaccharyltransferase PglB, which we have now shown to be a bifunctional enzyme also displaying hydrolase activity. The fOS levels in C. jejuni, similar to bacterial periplasmic glucans, can be manipulated by altering the salt and osmolyte concentrations in the growth environment. Here, we outline potential functions of fOS and raise new questions about the underlying mechanism involved in PglB-mediated fOS release from its lipid anchor and fOS retention within the C. jejuni periplasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirulenceSame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207