MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054605611 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608946104

Daam1 regulates the endocytosis of EphB during the convergent extension of the zebrafish notochord

2007· article· en· W2054605611 on OpenAlexaff
Yasuyuki S. Kida, Takayuki Sato, Kota Miyasaka, Asami Suto, Toshihiko Ogura

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersUniversity College LondonKanazawa University
KeywordsConvergent extensionCell biologyNotochordBiologyEndocytosisEndocytic cycleCytoskeletonWnt signaling pathwayZebrafishGastrulationSignal transductionCellBiochemistryEmbryogenesisEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convergent extension (CE) movement of cells is one of the fundamental processes that control the organized morphogenesis of tissues and organs. The molecular events connecting the noncanonical Wnt pathway and CE movement, however, are not well understood. We show that subcellular localization of Daam1, an essential component of noncanonical Wnt signaling, changes dynamically during notochord formation. In the early phases, Daam1 complexes with EphB receptors and Disheveled 2. This complex is incorporated into endocytic vesicles in a dynamin-dependent manner, thereby resulting in the removal of EphB from the cell surface with subsequent switching of cell adhesiveness. In the next step, Daam1 colocalizes with the actin cytoskeleton to induce morphological extension of cells. We elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the CE movement of notochord cells with Daam1 as a dynamic coordinator of endocytosis and cytoskeletal remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207