MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054616523 · doi:10.1080/00150190902961884

First-Principle Calculation of Elastic Compliance Coefficients for BiFeO<sub>3</sub>

2009· article· en· W2054616523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber SystemsMount Allison University
KeywordsMaterials scienceDensity functional theoryCondensed matter physicsExperimental dataLattice (music)Function (biology)Phenomenological modelThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elastic compliance coefficients of PbTiO 3 with/without geometric optimization are firstly calculated by using density-functional theory (DFT) under different exchange correlation functions. It is found that the best results are not obtained by LDA/CA-PZ and optimized structure although these induce the nearest lattice constants to experimental ones, however, the results of PbTiO 3 without geometry optimization under GGA/PW91 function are in great consistent with the experimental data. Based on the same calculating method of PbTiO 3 , the elastic compliance coefficients for BiFeO 3 are obtained. And the data are compared with previous results predicted by fitting experimental data to Landau-type phenomenological theory, which possessing the difference of an order of magnitude with our data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it