MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054625760 · doi:10.1063/1.3605480

Space charge mediated negative differential resistance in terahertz quantum well detectors

2011· article· en· W2054625760 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Delga, L. Doyennette, Amandine Buffaz, V. Berger, François-Régis Jasnot, L. A. de Vaulchier, Nicolas Péré‐Laperne, H. C. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationSpace chargeCondensed matter physicsDiscontinuity (linguistics)IonizationElectronPhysicsQuantum wellElectronic band structureCharge (physics)InfraredBolometerQuantum point contactQuantumDetectorOptoelectronicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In terahertz quantum well infrared photodetectors, a built-in-charge-mediated regime transition of the electronic transport is thoroughly investigated. The very strong current discontinuity and negative differential resistivity behavior are explained in terms of band structure reorganizations. The analysis of bias versus current measurements reveals that the transition occurs when the first two wells of the structure become partially drained, and the second well enters the ionized regime before the first one. Both many-body effects and a careful model of the contact have to be considered to account for these features. The source of the built-in charge is identified as intersubband impact ionization. The regime transition is one of its few experimental proofs, and provides an original approach to investigate hot electron kinetics in multi-quantum-well structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207