MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054632035 · doi:10.1063/1.2197027

Self-assembled InAs quantum dots and wires grown on a cleaved-edge GaAs(110) surface

2006· article· en· W2054632035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantum dotNucleationMolecular beam epitaxyMaterials sciencePlanarWaferEpitaxyOptoelectronicsGallium arsenideEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyChemistryPhysicsLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied the conditions for the Stranski-Krastanov mode of molecular beam epitaxial growth of InAs on a cleaved GaAs(110) surface. Temperature distributions on a subholder with cleaved facets were revealed using thermophotography. Combining these data with a theoretical model enabled a determination of the real temperature on the cleaved-edge surfaces (110), which differed markedly from the temperature on a planar wafer (100). Based on these results, we proposed an approach that combines different growth conditions in one technological process. As a result, appropriate growth conditions were established for InAs quantum dots grown on the cleaved GaAs(110) surface. Control over the dot nucleation process was shown to permit growth of both linear arrays of quantum dots and planar quantum wires on these (110) surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it