Le patrimoine religieux de la Nouvelle-Écosse. Signes et paradoxes en Acadie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le nom d’une institution laïque, appelée Université Sainte-Anne, apparaît déjà comme un paradoxe. Pourtant, l’histoire de ce collège, fondé par les eudistes en 1890, explique l’appellation de l’établissement. Malgré sa laïcisation en 1971, le souvenir des fondateurs s’y maintient et le respect de leur mission se poursuit autrement dans le même lieu, qui est un véritable site du patrimoine religieux des Acadiens de la Nouvelle-Écosse. Toutefois, les autres éléments du patrimoine religieux acadien seront-ils aussi bien servis? Au fait, à qui appartient ce patrimoine? Au clergé et à l’Église, qui assurent les services pastoraux auprès des Acadiens, ou aux fidèles, qui défraient les coûts de construction et d’entretien de ce patrimoine? Sommes-nous en présence de lieux de culte ou de biens culturels? Ce sont les réponses à des questions de cette nature qui déterminent les principaux axes retenus pour guider la réflexion de ces jours de colloque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".