MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054647557 · doi:10.1002/humu.22088

Inherited deleterious variants in<i>GALNT12</i>are associated with CRC susceptibility

2012· article· en· W2054647557 on OpenAlexafffund
Erica Clarke, Roger C. Green, Jane S. Green, Krista Mahoney, Patrick S. Parfrey, H. Banfield Younghusband, Michael O. Woods

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyProbandPedigree chartGeneticsAlleleColorectal cancerGeneCancerMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent report detailed the occurrence of both somatic and constitutional variants in the GALNT12 gene, located at 9q22.33, in some colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In this study, we investigate the occurrence of inherited deleterious variants in GALNT12 in 118 families referred to a cancer genetics clinic. We discovered two deleterious variants (c.907G>A (p.Asp303Asn); c.1187A>G (p.Tyr396Cys)) in 4/118 probands. The variants, which were not found in 149 control individuals (P = 0.0376), cosegregate with CRC and/or adenomatous polyps in other family members. The probability by chance that cosegregation of c.907G>A with CRC and/or adenomatous polyps occurred, in the two pedigrees combined, was 1.56%. Although this study does not provide irrefutable evidence that GALNT12 variants are highly penetrant alleles that predispose to CRC in the majority of unexplained hereditary CRC families, it does provide additional evidence to support an important role of these variants in a proportion of this considerable high-risk group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207