MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054673624 · doi:10.2118/86530-ms

Design, Implementation, Results, and Key Learnings: Case Study of a Novel Single Trip, Perforated, Multi-Zone, Isolated, Frac Pack Completion - Keong Subsea Development, South China Sea Floater Operations

2004· article· en· W2054673624 on OpenAlex
E. R. Davis, J. Curran, Paul Palthe, Pablo Saldungaray

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaCompletion (oil and gas wells)Petroleum engineeringEngineeringWellboreMarine engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Keong subsea development is located in Indonesia's Natuna Sea section of the South China Sea in the Block B concession operated by ConocoPhillips on behalf of itself and its co-venturers ChevronTexaco and Inpex. This gas field is one in a series of ConocoPhillips' subsea developments currently underway to fulfill key Southeast Asian long-term gas supply contracts. Therefore, high performance completions are required to drive efficiency in capital-intensive floater operations and subsea environments. Keong 1 was planned as a cased hole perforated, fracpacked, multi-zone producer. The well was designed to develop a series of laminated high gross to net unconsolidated sands in the temporarily abandoned discovery well, saving both time and money over a new drill. Four separate sand bodies were targeted in the completion. The type of completion was selected to match the existing wellbore configuration, reservoir properties and productivity needs. A sand exclusion completion was designed that would enable the development of the highly laminated reserves. A single trip, fracpacking, sand exclusion liner completion system to minimize expensive floater rig time and to minimize reservoir/near wellbore damage from well killing operations was also required. A novel combination of multi-zone Alternate Path Technology (APT) isolation packers, with APT sand exclusion liners enabled the simultaneous fracpacking of the three individual zones in a single fracpacking operation. Details of the fracpack design, tool modifications, field application and field observations are discussed. Acquired pressure data from downhole sensors demonstrates that effective fracpacking of all zones was achieved. Results from subsequent production and pressure build-up data prove the attainment of a zero to negative skin verifying the applicability of the tools and process. This application resulted in savings to ConocoPhillips in completion costs, in addition to the production acceleration benefits of an efficient completion. The objective of this paper is to present a "conception to production" high performance sand exclusion completion case history from ConocoPhillips' Keong subsea development in the South China Sea. Throughout the paper the design, implementation, operational problems, well performance results and key learnings will be discussed in detail in order to advance the technology and document the proposed completion methodology as an alternative for high deliverability wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it